← Search

Jess Vamvas

Princeton, NJ
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
92 matches · 45W–47L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add Jess Vamvas to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history92 matches
W
2026-08-27 · No Man's Land · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mia Cote
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-08-25 · No Man's Land · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erika Verschelde
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-08-17 · No Man's Land · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristen Seligman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-5, 0-1
W
2026-08-16 · Bring It On!!! · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nischint Manelkar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Jennifer Lafaman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
Clare Gray / Jennifer Walsh
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Jennifer Lafaman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-10 · Volley Girls · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lina Zahlan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-27 · Volley Girls · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-20 · Volley Girls · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-13 · Volley Girls · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-12 · Bring It On!!! · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nischint Manelkar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-24 · Cherry Valley · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Millie Chandler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
25%
1W–3L · 49.3% of games
2.5
73.9%
17W–6L · 59.6% of games
3.0
41.7%
20W–28L · 45.4% of games
3.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 43.3% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
16 matches
#1 Singles
10%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams