← Search

Diana Eppert

Austin, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 55W–31L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Diana Eppert to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history86 matches
W
2026-06-20 · Double Shots · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yanina Carena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-5
L
2026-06-17 · Naughty by NETure · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Wolf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
Katherine Baronet / Jennifer Erickson
2026-06-13 · Double Shots · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yanina Carena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · Double Shots · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debbie Zeitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-19 · Naughty by NETure · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Baum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-06 · Naughty by NETure · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tammy Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-06 · Naughty by NETure · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alli Carr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-25 · Double Shots · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Repass
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-03-11 · Naughty by NETure · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alli Carr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-04 · Naughty by NETure · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vanessa Sumner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
2025-10-22 · Naughty by NETure · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alli Carr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-1
W
2025-10-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yanina Carena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
59.1%
13W–9L · 51.8% of games
3.5
68.8%
33W–15L · 53.7% of games
4.0
56.2%
9W–7L · 50.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
9 matches
#2 Singles
8%
7 matches
#1 Singles
7%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe