← Search

Rachel Boisvert

— year-end
90 matches · 70W–20L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Rachel Boisvert to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
W
2026-04-28 · Oakley/HCP/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Ottofaro Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-14 · Oakley/HCP/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-03 · Oakley/HCP/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Marissa Kleber / Mallory Miller
2025-11-15 · #1 Doubles · with Meng-shen Kan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
Monica Carlson / Catherine Land
2025-11-14 · #1 Doubles · with Meng-shen Kan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-10-22 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Meng-shen Kan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-10-14 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Oksana Lackey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-10-08 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Meng-shen Kan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-10-01 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kerri Oakley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
Megan Reid / Lydia Sanders
2025-09-23 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Oksana Lackey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2025-09-10 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Meng-shen Kan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-03 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amanda Moose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 69.2% of games
2.5
100%
5W–0L · 82.2% of games
3.0
90%
9W–1L · 74.4% of games
3.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 64.8% of games
4.0
90.9%
10W–1L · 63.3% of games
5.0
40%
2W–3L · 40.4% of games
5.5
100%
4W–0L · 85.7% of games
6.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 68.5% of games
7.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 64.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
17 matches
#1 Singles
11%
10 matches
#2 Singles
10%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
9 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer