← Search

Rebecca Villalba

— year-end
29 matches · 11W–18L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Rebecca Villalba to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history29 matches
L
2026-08-30 · Open/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christina Pauley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-25 · Open/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Allison Demilio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-16 · Open/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sophie Lair
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-11 · Open/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Justin Stivers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
Alyssa Maddox / Niles Maddox
2026-07-07 · Open/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yang Xu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
L
Brooke Govert / Brayden Phillips
2026-06-25 · Open/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yufei Wu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-02 · Thompson/Knoxville · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-25 · Thompson/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marilyn Cameron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
Sarah Olesiuk / Jennifer Cook
2026-04-24 · Thompson/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Beth Barnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-28 · Thompson/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Becca Decker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-21 · Thompson/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Becca Decker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-02-17 · Grindstaff/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Becca Decker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
Teams9 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 65% of games
3.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 39% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 46.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 62% of the time
#2 Doubles
62%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
4 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer