← Search

Maura Wygmans

— year-end
54 matches · 34W–20L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Maura Wygmans to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
L
2026-05-17 · ESB:Not My Fault:Strausser/Blackmore · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeanne Blackmore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-11 · ESB:Keech · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chris Flaherty mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-04-04 · MIT:Tie Dye Breakers:Dunn · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-03-28 · MIT:Tie Dye Breakers:Dunn · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeanne Blackmore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-03-22 · ESB:Keech · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ben Nappi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-03-14 · MIT:Match.Net:Marshall · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Keil mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-02-15 · MIT:Match.Net:Marshall · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Justin Wygmans mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
W
Cindy Fonseca / Laura Williams
2026-01-31 · MIT:Tie Dye Breakers:Dunn · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-01-24 · ESB:Keech · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lee Rosen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2025-09-20 · ESB:Smash Hits:Wygmans · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeanne Blackmore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-09-14 · ESB:Smash Hits:Wygmans · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeanne Blackmore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-06-08 · MIT:Dunn · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeanne Blackmore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Teams23 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
75%
21W–7L · 61.4% of games
4.0
60%
6W–4L · 54.8% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 52.9% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
12 matches
#1 Singles
11%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova