← Search

Malik Hagens

— year-end
149 matches · 118W–31L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Malik Hagens to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history149 matches
L
2026-07-22 · Sandweiss · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Isabel Mosley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-21 · STL/Bakai-Lesko/High-Tri-Level · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Travis Bakai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-15 · Sandweiss · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Megan Wall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-30 · STL/Bakai-Lesko/High-Tri-Level · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with McKenzie Rawden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-24 · Sandweiss · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Moore mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-23 · STL/Bakai-Lesko/High-Tri-Level · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Travis Bakai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Jennifer Smith / Joel Pottebaum
2026-06-17 · Sandweiss · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Isabel Mosley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-5
W
2026-06-16 · STL/Bakai-Lesko/High-Tri-Level · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Charles Welton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-03 · STLWC/Sandweiss/18&Over4.0M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with McKenzie Rawden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-5
W
2026-04-26 · STLWC/Sandweiss/18&Over4.0M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Papproth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-19 · STLWC/Sandweiss/18&Over4.0M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with McKenzie Rawden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-12 · STLWC/Sandweiss/18&Over4.0M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with McKenzie Rawden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Teams26 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
60%
3W–2L · 57.8% of games
3.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 53.7% of games
3.5
79.1%
34W–9L · 59.3% of games
4.0
85.9%
61W–10L · 59.3% of games
7.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 60% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 50.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
62 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
36 matches
#1 Singles
15%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
22 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams