← Search

Lisa Moore

— year-end
275 matches · 145W–130L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lisa Moore to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history275 matches
L
2026-08-24 · Eldridge · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patricia Fry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-10 · Eldridge · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Becky Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-05 · Sandweiss · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Wesley Law mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-07-09 · STLWC/Woodard-Feldman/40&Over4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Wall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-25 · STLWC/Woodard-Feldman/40&Over4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keli Keener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-06-24 · Sandweiss · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Malik Hagens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-11 · STLWC/Woodard-Feldman/40&Over4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Crowner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-10 · Sandweiss · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Wesley Law mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-28 · STLWC/Woodard-Feldman/40&Over4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Inman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · Woodard/Feldman (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-04-26 · Woodard/Feldman (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-04-12 · Woodard/Feldman (S) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristie Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Teams61 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
40%
2W–3L · 46.7% of games
3.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 52.8% of games
3.5
50%
11W–11L · 49.3% of games
4.0
54%
94W–80L · 52.5% of games
4.5
48%
12W–13L · 48.5% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
50%
4W–4L · 51.7% of games
9.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 53.3% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 49.6% of games
8.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 55.9% of games
9.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 41.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
154 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
74 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
45 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe