← Search

Amanda Lovejoy

Greenwich, CT
4.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
110 matches · 33W–77L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Amanda Lovejoy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history110 matches
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynn Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-23 · GRC: Greenwich Racquet Club: Leon/Zaminski · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-2
L
Courtney McKinney / Laura Cramer
2026-06-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sophie Porcelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-02 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-19 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3
L
2026-03-23 · Life Time Pearl · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Sippel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-16 · Life Time Pearl · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Titone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-03-02 · Life Time Pearl · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rossana Daddio-Menna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-02-13 · Life Time Pearl · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shuofei Gao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-08 · Life Time Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nefertiti Greene
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-15 · Life Time Pearl · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sophie Porcelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 65.8% of games
4.0
24.2%
23W–72L · 41.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 31% of the time
#1 Singles
31%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
10%
11 matches
#2 Singles
8%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer