← Search

Qing Radebaugh

— year-end
98 matches · 60W–38L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Qing Radebaugh to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history98 matches
W
Lisa Singer / Jolene Bogner
2026-04-12 · NewGen · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tricia Shinnick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-03-22 · NewGen · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jodi Gibbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-03-15 · NewGen · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joy Polintan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
Kimberly Minrovic / Sarah Miller
2026-03-08 · NewGen · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Poole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
Ashley Graber / Melissa Soderberg
2026-03-01 · NewGen · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joy Polintan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-5, 1-0
W
2026-02-22 · NewGen · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joy Polintan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-2
W
2026-02-01 · NewGen · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joy Polintan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-01-18 · New Gen · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emi Sauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-05 · Elysium 1 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Henry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-12-21 · New Gen · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emi Sauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2025-12-08 · Elysium 1 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debbie Korcykoski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-4, 1-0
W
2025-12-07 · New Gen · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emi Sauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-0, 1-0
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
50%
6W–6L · 49.5% of games
3.0
64.3%
45W–25L · 54% of games
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
75%
3W–1L · 52.1% of games
6.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 50.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 24% of the time
#1 Doubles
24%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
22 matches
#2 Singles
19%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
17 matches
#1 Singles
16%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova