← Search

Emi Sauer

Powell, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
96 matches · 52W–44L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Emi Sauer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history96 matches
W
2026-07-22 · Racquet Club 2 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Megan Landis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-07-08 · Racquet Club 2 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Sibio
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-01 · Racquet Club 2 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brecke Pohl
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-26 · Racquet Club 3 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-04-12 · Racquet Club 3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Biehl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-22 · Racquet Club 3 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-03-15 · Racquet Club 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jackie Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-08 · Racquet Club 3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Biehl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-3
L
2026-03-01 · Racquet Club 3 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-02-15 · Racquet Club 3 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-01-18 · New Gen · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Qing Radebaugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-04 · New Gen · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Huan Li
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
59.4%
38W–26L · 56% of games
3.5
41.4%
12W–17L · 44.2% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 41% of the time
#1 Singles
41%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
32 matches
#2 Singles
10%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
8%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams