← Search

Rebecca Sara Cook

— year-end
77 matches · 32W–45L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Rebecca Sara Cook to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history77 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Lahey/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly Bennie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-26 · Lahey/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Vicki Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-08-25 · Acing Gracefully · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-21 · Nau/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Manley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-18 · Lahey/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Hollie Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-31 · Nau/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joy Helton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-23 · Acing Gracefully · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-16 · Acing Gracefully · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · Lahey/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Lahey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-01 · Lahey/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Lahey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-27 · Pulley/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Pillans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-25 · Lahey/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leena Choi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
Teams42 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
48.7%
19W–20L · 50.1% of games
4.0
25.9%
7W–20L · 38.9% of games
7.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 48.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
17 matches
#1 Singles
16%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
12 matches
#2 Singles
12%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King