← Search

Leena Choi

— year-end
50 matches · 14W–36L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Leena Choi to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
L
Eric Howser / Renee Adams
2026-07-25 · Zhang/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Girish Hiremath mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
Ryan Cluff / Renee Adams
2026-06-27 · Zhang/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jerry Zhang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-06-24 · Brandon/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynn Blocher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-10 · Brandon/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-06 · Zhang/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Girish Hiremath mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-03 · Yung-Okamoto/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Browder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-04-26 · Yung-Okamoto/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Schultz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-04-25 · Lahey/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Sara Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-03-08 · Yung-Okamoto/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with LIsa Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2025-11-13 · Neeley/Brandon/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pat Yung-Okamoto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-12 · Neeley/Brandon/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pat Yung-Okamoto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2025-11-06 · Neeley/Brandon/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pat Yung-Okamoto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
52.6%
10W–9L · 51% of games
4.0
0%
0W–21L · 32.9% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 59.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
8 matches
#1 Singles
10%
5 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe