← Search

Anna T Heath

Charlotte, NC
3.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
55 matches · 20W–35L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Anna T Heath to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history55 matches
L
2026-09-09 · BBaker (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Allison Purmort
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-26 · GRhew (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Marjorie Armstrong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-19 · BBaker (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katherine Koppel-Dobbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-18 · GRhew (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Gillian Rhew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-10 · AJeter/LPackman (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Wesley Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-03 · AJeter/LPackman (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Anne Sadler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-29 · AJeter/LPackman (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lauren Packman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-01 · BBaker (Park Road) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brittany Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-25 · BBaker (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Koppel-Dobbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-11 · BBaker (Park Road) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Kopec
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2025-09-17 · APurmort (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Allison Purmort
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2024-10-01 · AHeath (Park Road) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sally Licandro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0
42.9%
6W–8L · 42.9% of games
3.5
25%
2W–6L · 31.5% of games
5.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 57.1% of games
6.5
38.9%
7W–11L · 49.5% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
11 matches
#2 Singles
11%
6 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
1 match
#1 Female Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal