Kerri Tullis
125 matches · 60W–65L · seasons 2022–2025
Captains: add Kerri Tullis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history125 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
Jessica Franklin / Laurie Hallbeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
Jessica Franklin / Laurie Hallbeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
Kelly Scudder / Martha Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
Teams29 teams · 2022–2025
KTC Bartek
KTC Bartek
KTC Gustafson
KTC Gustafson
KTC Linhardt
KTC Sauer
QRRC Hayes
QRRC Linhardt
KTC Hudson
KTC Linhardt
KTC Stout
KTC-Stout
QRRC Bartek
QRRC Coffman
QRRC Oakley
QRRC Schell
QRRC-Burkle
QRRC-Coffman
QRRC-Oakley
QRRC-Schell
KTC-Hudson
QRRC Hayes
QRRC Williams
QRRC-Hayes
QRRC-Schell
KTC-Linhardt
QRRC-Brooks
QRRC-Williams
QRRC-Williams
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 52.6% of games
3.0
63.8%
44W–25L · 52.7% of games
3.5
13.5%
5W–32L · 38.3% of games
5.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 53.7% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
40 matches
#1 Singles
32%
40 matches
#2 Singles
18%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.