← Search

Josh Mann

— year-end
133 matches · 75W–58L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Josh Mann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history133 matches
L
2026-08-19 · Hempfield - Arters · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-12 · Hempfield - Arters · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Roeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-29 · Hempfield - Arters · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Weitzel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-19 · Hempfield - Arters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shane Burridge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-06 · Hempfield - Arters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffery Arters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-01 · Hempfield - Arters · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-29 · Hempfield - Arters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Weitzel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-03 · Hempfield - Arters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffery Arters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-27 · Hempfield - Arters · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Devon Clemmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-22 · Hempfield - Arters · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shane Burridge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-03-29 · Hempfield NO MERCY - Banh · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Caitlin Barcheski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-22 · Hempfield NO MERCY - Banh · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Annie Rakos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
Teams32 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 63.3% of games
3.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 63.9% of games
3.5
64.7%
22W–12L · 53.6% of games
4.0
42.3%
11W–15L · 46.9% of games
7.0
0%
0W–5L · 34.8% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
0%
0W–6L · 35.2% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
67.6%
23W–11L · 55.7% of games
8.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 57.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
29 matches
#1 Singles
7%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer