← Search

Caitlin Barcheski

Lancaster, PA
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
130 matches · 59W–71L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Caitlin Barcheski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history130 matches
L
2026-07-17 · Hempfield Brunch Babes - Schlager · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sophia Duke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-29 · Hempfield Brunch Babes - Schlager · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristine Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-06-14 · Hempfield Brunch Babes - Schlager · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sophia Duke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-17 · Hempfield Brunch Babes - Schlager · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bonnie Westheaffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · with Josh Mann championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-29 · Hempfield NO MERCY - Banh · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Josh Mann mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-01 · Hempfield NO MERCY - Banh · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shane Burridge mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-18 · Hempfield NO MERCY - Banh · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brandon Longenecker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-22 · Hempfield- Brunch Babes (Schlager) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
John Schmitt / Kaelyn Balko
2025-04-26 · #2 Doubles · with Jason Young championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-04-06 · Hempfield - Barron · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daulton Loose mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-03-30 · Hempfield - No Mercy · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jason Young mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
45.7%
16W–19L · 50.9% of games
4.0
48.3%
14W–15L · 50.1% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
55.6%
15W–12L · 53.2% of games
8.0mixed
30%
6W–14L · 39.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
26 matches
#1 Singles
17%
22 matches
#2 Singles
8%
10 matches
#1 Female Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer