← Search

Heather Walters

Roswell, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 32W–9L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Heather Walters to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
L
2026-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Rivenbark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 2-6
W
2026-06-25 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Fowler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 6-4
W
Jennifer Thiel / Julie Worly
2026-06-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Rivenbark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Scurry-Thomson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Rivenbark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-0
W
2025-12-06 · Wexford (Aubrie Mayeux)* · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-11-15 · Wexford (Aubrie Mayeux)* · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 6-3
L
2025-07-10 · Wexford (Katherine Fowler)* · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
Laura Hunter / Karen Williams
2025-07-06 · Wexford (Dawn Scurry-Thomson)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jillian Smoller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2025-06-29 · Wexford (Dawn Scurry-Thomson)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Scurry-Thomson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 6-3
W
2025-06-22 · Wexford (Dawn Scurry-Thomson)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Chambers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 7-5
L
Kerri Brown / Liz North
2025-06-18 · Wexford (Katherine Fowler)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cass Harrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
100%
6W–0L · 81.1% of games
3.0
75%
3W–1L · 58.5% of games
3.5
74.2%
23W–8L · 57.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 49% of the time
#1 Singles
49%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
6 matches
#2 Singles
15%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe