← Search

Chelsea Fraenkel

Scarsdale, NY
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
42 matches · 16W–26L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Chelsea Fraenkel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history42 matches
W
2026-03-12 · Old Oaks · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ilona Pokoik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-03 · Old Oaks · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rory VanGelder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
Masha Gregorius / Anna Boros Solinsky
2026-02-10 · Old Oaks · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robin Abrutyn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-01-27 · Old Oaks · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ilona Pokoik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
Nicole Paxton / Kelly Walsh
2026-01-06 · Old Oaks · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Gladstone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-11-18 · Old Oaks · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ilona Pokoik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-16 · Old Oaks · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elinor Etkes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2025-03-04 · Old Oaks · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Wiczyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-02-25 · Old Oaks · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Wiczyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-02-11 · Old Oaks · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Wiczyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-02-04 · Old Oaks · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Wiczyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-01-21 · Old Oaks · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tatiana Zamarron Villalba
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.0
38.1%
16W–26L · 44.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal