← Search

Tatiana Zamarron Villalba

— year-end
43 matches · 20W–23L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Tatiana Zamarron Villalba to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history43 matches
W
2026-03-18 · Old Oaks · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elinor Etkes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-02-10 · Old Oaks · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rory VanGelder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-01-27 · Old Oaks · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elinor Etkes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-11-18 · Old Oaks · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elinor Etkes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
Lorraine Godfrey / Kelly Shaw
2025-11-14 · Old Oaks · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rory VanGelder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2025-10-21 · Old Oaks · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Gladstone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-09-18 · Old Oaks · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Kantor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-02-26 · Old Oaks · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jodi Mcgill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-02-25 · Old Oaks · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Tanenbaum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-02-11 · Old Oaks · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Tanenbaum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-01-27 · Old Oaks · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jodi Mcgill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
2025-01-21 · Old Oaks · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chelsea Fraenkel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
Teams13 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
47.4%
18W–20L · 49.9% of games
3.5
40%
2W–3L · 46.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King