← Search

Mary Binecki

Washington, DC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
129 matches · 81W–48L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Mary Binecki to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history129 matches
W
2026-08-30 · No Man's Land · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 5-3
W
2026-08-30 · Cedar Sprint · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chandler Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-2
W
2026-08-29 · No Man's Land · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-29 · Cedar Sprint · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-2
L
2026-08-16 · Cedar Sprint · #3 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-6
L
2026-08-16 · Cedar Sprint · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Koleski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-3
L
2026-08-16 · Cedar Sprint · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hana Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-08 · No Man's Land · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-19 · No Man's Land · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-0
W
2026-07-18 · Cedar Sprint · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Koleski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-18 · Cedar Sprint · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Koleski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-0
W
Suzanne Bell
2026-07-12 · No Man's Land · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
70.2%
40W–17L · 62.4% of games
4.0
52.9%
9W–8L · 50.7% of games
6.5
60%
3W–2L · 48.3% of games
7.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 47.3% of games
3.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 43.3% of games
7.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 55.3% of games
7.5mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 63.8% of games
8.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 53.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
34 matches
#1 Singles
4%
5 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches
#3 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe