← Search

Katherine Koleski

Washington, DC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
107 matches · 56W–51L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Katherine Koleski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history107 matches
W
2026-08-21 · Cedar Sprint · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-16 · Cedar Sprint · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Binecki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-3
W
2026-07-26 · Cedar Sprint · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colleen Ryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-4
W
2026-07-18 · Cedar Sprint · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Binecki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-18 · Cedar Sprint · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Binecki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-0
L
2026-06-20 · Cedar Sprint · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sueyun Hsieh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-06-13 · Over Served · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hana Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-11 · Over Served · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Kahn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-2
W
2026-05-31 · Over Served · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Jacob
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-17 · Over Served · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-4
W
2026-05-17 · Cedar Sprint · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kasey Kinney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-2
L
2026-05-09 · Over Served · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kera Tyler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
60%
27W–18L · 57.1% of games
4.0
26.3%
5W–14L · 38.6% of games
7.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 51.8% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 56% of games
7.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 49.5% of games
7.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 41.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
24 matches
#1 Singles
14%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
13 matches
#2 Singles
6%
6 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer