← Search

Kathleen Barnett

— year-end
61 matches · 29W–32L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Kathleen Barnett to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history61 matches
L
Ariana Dickens / Fay Crawshaw
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Phyllis Corley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
Kelly Terrell / Andrea Horton
2026-07-17 · #3 Doubles · with Phyllis Corley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-06 · Team 2 Barnett Slice Girls · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Phyllis Corley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-28 · Team 2 Barnett Slice Girls · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Belardo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-23 · Team 5 Slice Girls · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Caroline Hess
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-1
W
2026-03-21 · Team 19 Slice Girls · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Plofchan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-02-28 · Team 19 Slice Girls · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Albanese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7
L
2026-02-17 · Team 19 Slice Girls · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Pallotta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-16 · Barnett - Slice Girls · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Plofchan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-5
W
N/A
2026-01-31 · Team 19 Slice Girls · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Belardo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-01-24 · Team 19 Slice Girls · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patti Sinnen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-08 · #3 Doubles · with Lisa Furgal championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
41.9%
13W–18L · 45.6% of games
3.0
50%
11W–11L · 53.4% of games
6.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 53% of the time
#3 Doubles
53%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
8 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer