← Search

Jane Ignacio

Springfield, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
117 matches · 29W–88L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jane Ignacio to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history117 matches
L
2026-07-12 · Team 13 Causing a Racquet 3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christy Bixler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-06 · Team 13 Causing a Racquet 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yolanda Tsai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-30 · Team 8 Montague-Daddio · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Larson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-15 · Team 10 Causing a Racquet 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Fultz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-4
W
2026-05-03 · Team 10 Causing a Racquet 3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacqueline Duarte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-17 · Team 5 Causing a Racquet 6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Larson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-12 · Team 8 Montague-Daddio · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Larson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-03-22 · Team 12 Deuces Wild · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Barr Weiss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-18 · Team 12 Deuces Wild · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ayako Doi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-5
L
2026-03-14 · Team 12 Deuces Wild · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Herbold
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-3
W
2026-03-14 · Team 11 Causing a Racquet · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Gelfond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-09 · Team 5 Causing a Racquet 6.0 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ryan Kwon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
50%
6W–6L · 49.3% of games
3.0
16.7%
8W–40L · 35.6% of games
3.5
25%
7W–21L · 36.6% of games
5.5
25%
3W–9L · 42.6% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
18.2%
2W–9L · 46% of games
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
22 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe