← Search

Stephanie Finland

Troy, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
87 matches · 48W–39L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Stephanie Finland to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history87 matches
W
2026-08-02 · #3 Doubles · with Shannon Dickstein championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Shannon Dickstein championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · with Adrienne Eshelman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-22 · WESS-Studier 18s 3.0 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diane Leathers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-14 · TROY-Vondell 40s 3.0 NW F2 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Mellesmoen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · WESS-Studier 18s 3.0 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erinn Smiley-studier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
N/A
2026-07-05 · WESS-Studier 18s 3.0 NW F3 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Caroline Perry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-30 · TROY-Vondell 40s 3.0 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alyce Howarth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-11 · WESS-Studier 18s 3.0 NW F3 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Caroline Perry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-04-17 · TROY-Li LOW TRI WOMEN F · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Qing Li
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W
Arielle Gupta / Kimberly Nicol
2026-04-11 · TROY-Li LOW TRI WOMEN F · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Qing Li
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-21 · TROY-Li LOW TRI WOMEN F · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sally Witt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
50%
3W–3L · 53% of games
3.0
52.3%
23W–21L · 52.2% of games
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.0
100%
5W–0L · 83.1% of games
5.5
40%
2W–3L · 36.3% of games
6.0
38.5%
5W–8L · 47.5% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
29 matches
#1 Singles
21%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
12 matches
#2 Singles
9%
8 matches
#3 Singles
5%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer