← Search

Erinn Smiley-studier

Clarkston, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
115 matches · 64W–51L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Erinn Smiley-studier to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history115 matches
W
Brenda Cortes / Rutwick Garude
2026-08-31 · WESS-Studier 5.5 Mix Combo · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Garrett Studier mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-19 · WESS-Studier 5.5 Mix Combo · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Marc Studier mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-05 · WESS-Studier 5.5 Mix Combo · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Marc Studier mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
W
Ginny Roche-Kelly / Greg Stepp
2026-08-03 · WESS-Studier 5.5 Mix Combo · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Garrett Studier mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
Erin Gregoire / Julie Roth
2026-08-02 · #2 Doubles · with Kristin Bradley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-08-01 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-31 · TROY-Colbert 18s 6.0X F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tim Walter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-24 · TROY-Colbert 18s 6.0X F · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jonathon Hohner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · WESS-Studier 18s 3.0 NW F3 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
Kelsey Ewing
2026-07-16 · WESS-Studier 18s 3.0 NW F3 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-10 · TROY-Colbert 18s 6.0X F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jonathon Hohner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-09 · WESS-Studier 18s 3.0 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Finland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
71.4%
15W–6L · 64.3% of games
3.0
54.8%
23W–19L · 54.4% of games
5.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 46.1% of games
5.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 63.2% of games
6.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 49.4% of games
6.5
25%
1W–3L · 34.3% of games
5.5mixed
50%
5W–5L · 55.7% of games
6.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 46.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 25% of the time
#3 Doubles
25%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
23 matches
#1 Singles
13%
15 matches
#2 Singles
11%
13 matches
#3 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova