← Search

Danielle Witte

Denver, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
114 matches · 59W–55L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Danielle Witte to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history114 matches
L
2026-08-31 · RCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Dittmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-24 · RCC GREEN · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-10 · RCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dani Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-09 · RCC YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Reinhard Sturm mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-05 · RCC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yeon Ham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
Whitney Jones / Lalenia Quinlan Aweida
2026-08-03 · RCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yeon Ham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-29 · RCC RED · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-27 · RCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-22 · RCC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristen Hamill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-22 · RCC YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Vieau mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-07-13 · RCC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Odegaard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-06 · RCC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Gritzmacher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
25%
1W–3L · 46.6% of games
2.5
62.7%
32W–19L · 55.2% of games
3.0
38.5%
15W–24L · 47.5% of games
5.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 54% of games
6.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 55.4% of games
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
48 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
16 matches
#1 Singles
9%
10 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer