← Search

Alia Ghandour

Boulder, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
193 matches · 79W–114L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Alia Ghandour to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history193 matches
L
2026-09-03 · BTA-C GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Riley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-27 · BTA-C GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eva Raschke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-19 · BTA-C ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Derek Rikke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-08-16 · BTA-C ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christian Evans mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-13 · BTA-C GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nina Rodd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-09 · BTA-C ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christian Evans mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Nina Rodd championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-30 · BTA-C GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nina Rodd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-28 · BTA-C ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Germano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · BTA-C ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Reese Brammell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · BTA-C ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ardith Falkner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-07-19 · BTA-C ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Derek Rikke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
37.2%
32W–54L · 44.7% of games
3.5
48%
24W–26L · 48.7% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 39% of games
6.5mixed
52.6%
10W–9L · 53.4% of games
7.0mixed
36.4%
8W–14L · 44.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
64 matches
#1 Singles
16%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
30 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe