← Search

Casey Wood

Saint Louis, MO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
67 matches · 20W–47L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Casey Wood to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history67 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Elias-Hurst (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Quindry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-12 · Elias/Huels (S) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Tesar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-03-29 · Elias/Huels (S) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Hurst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
John Fechter / Jonathan Kim
2026-02-22 · Elias/Huels (S) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard Elias
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-02-15 · Elias/Huels (S) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Schrautemeier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-18 · Elias/Huels (S) · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-12-07 · Elias/Huels (F) · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-11-02 · Elias/Huels (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anthony Trent
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-09-14 · Elias/Huels (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rob DuHadway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-09-07 · Elias/Huels (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rob DuHadway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-05-04 · Elias/Shultz (S) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Quindry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-04-27 · Elias/Shultz (S) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Quindry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
0%
0W–4L · 36% of games
3.5
44.4%
12W–15L · 50.5% of games
4.0
22.2%
8W–28L · 41.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
22 matches
#2 Singles
24%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
8 matches
#1 Singles
9%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe