← Search

Eric Lawson

Ann Arbor, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
100 matches · 21W–79L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Eric Lawson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history100 matches
L
2026-07-17 · LIB-Reynolds 18s 3.0M F1 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-14 · LIB-Lawson 40s 3.0M F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jean-jean Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-07 · LIB-Lawson 40s 3.0M F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christopher Prisby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-30 · LIB-Lawson 40s 3.0M F1 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-29 · LIB-Lawson 40s 3.0M F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alon Kahana
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-25 · LIB-Reynolds 18s 3.0M F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Baylen Springer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
Scott Harris / Christian Ibanez
2026-06-23 · LIB-Lawson 40s 3.0M F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ryan Housekeeper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
Brett Cohen / Hiroaki Gentsu
2026-06-18 · LIB-Reynolds 18s 3.0M F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ben Berry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-11 · LIB-Reynolds 18s 3.0M F1 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-09 · LIB-Lawson 40s 3.0M F1 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Baylen Springer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-04 · LIB-Reynolds 18s 3.0M F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Acar Altinsel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-06-02 · LIB-Lawson 40s 3.0M F1 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
15.9%
10W–53L · 34.5% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 28.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
21 matches
#3 Singles
10%
10 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova