← Search

Acar Altinsel

Ann Arbor, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
96 matches · 36W–60L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Acar Altinsel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history96 matches
W
2026-08-07 · LIB-Gonzalez 18s 6.0X F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tracy Esposito mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-23 · LIB-Reynolds 40s 3.0M F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Steve Armstrong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-16 · LIB-Reynolds 40s 3.0M F1 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Elliott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-12 · LIB-Gonzalez 18s 6.0X F · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kelly Altinsel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-09 · LIB-Reynolds 40s 3.0M F1 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barry St Pierre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · LIB-Reynolds 18s 3.0M F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eric Lawson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-06-02 · LIB-Reynolds 40s 3.0M F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brady Vance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-28 · LIB-Reynolds 18s 3.0M F1 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
Adam Crafard / Mckay Shih
2026-05-19 · LIB-Reynolds 40s 3.0M F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tim Atkinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-14 · LIB-Reynolds 18s 3.0M F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ben Berry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-19 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kelly Altinsel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-03-21 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kelly Altinsel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
36.1%
13W–23L · 43.6% of games
5.5
50%
4W–4L · 54.4% of games
6.0
23.5%
4W–13L · 41.6% of games
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
46.2%
12W–14L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 29% of the time
#3 Doubles
29%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
19 matches
#2 Singles
10%
10 matches
#1 Singles
9%
9 matches
#3 Singles
6%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert