← Search

Stephanie Shawn

Arvada, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
144 matches · 111W–33L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Stephanie Shawn to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history144 matches
W
2026-08-25 · NJ BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caitlin Bock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-23 · NJ PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jeremy Riggle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-16 · NJ PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jeremy Riggle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-08-10 · NJ BLUE · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Meng Lian mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-09 · NJ BLUE · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Meng Lian mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-04 · NJ BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Macy Bauerle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-21 · NJ BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caitlin Bock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · NJ BLUE · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Meng Lian mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-14 · NJ TEAL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Shaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · NJ PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mark Kiker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-07 · NJ TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Pivovar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · NJ TEAL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josiane Broussard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
84.2%
16W–3L · 64.3% of games
3.5
78.3%
18W–5L · 61.5% of games
4.0
84.9%
45W–8L · 58.5% of games
5.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 60.5% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 54% of games
7.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 60.9% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 56.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
47 matches
#1 Singles
24%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
23 matches
#2 Singles
5%
7 matches
#1 Female Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer