← Search

Caitlin Bock

Westminster, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
187 matches · 123W–64L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Caitlin Bock to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history187 matches
W
2026-08-25 · NJ BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Shawn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-09 · NJ PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ryan Welborn - * mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-04 · NJ BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Verhonica Hirst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-28 · NJ BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Verhonica Hirst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-21 · NJ BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Shawn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · NJ PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kenneth Earl mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-28 · NJ RED · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ryan Welborn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
Julie Schoenfeld / Amy Novak
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · with Stephanie Shawn championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-09 · NJ RED · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ryan Welborn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-26 · NJ GOLD · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Verhonica Hirst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
Bryan Racz / Laura Peterson
2026-05-24 · NJ RED · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ryan Welborn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-05-23 · NJ GOLD · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Verhonica Hirst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 59% of games
2.5
100%
7W–0L · 86.6% of games
3.0
83.3%
20W–4L · 58% of games
3.5
63.6%
21W–12L · 55.5% of games
4.0
43.9%
18W–23L · 44.9% of games
5.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 55.7% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 58.7% of games
7.0mixed
100%
9W–0L · 66% of games
7.5mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 52% of games
8.0mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 48.9% of games
8.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
29 matches
#1 Singles
15%
28 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
7 matches
#1 Female Singles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams