← Search

Chrissy Stansell

Richardson, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
40 matches · 33W–7L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Chrissy Stansell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history40 matches
W
2026-09-11 · Team 23 Canyon Creek/Romness W4.0F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Weinblatt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-05-28 · Canyon Creek/Romness W4.0T · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-15 · Canyon Creek/Romness W4.0T · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-14 · Canyon Creek/Romness W4.0T · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Weinblatt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-02 · Canyon Creek/Leary W4.0S · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-02-27 · Canyon Creek/Kramer-Romness W4.0F · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-02-13 · Canyon Creek/Kramer-Romness W4.0F · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mollie Romness
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-11 · Canyon Creek/Kramer-Romness W4.0F · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-11 · Canyon Creek/Kramer-Romness W4.0F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Bates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-01-16 · Canyon Creek/Kramer-Romness W4.0F · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Snitker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-11-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Shafer-Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-10-27 · Canyon Creek/Whitaker W3.5F · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
100%
4W–0L · 85.7% of games
3.5
91.3%
21W–2L · 66.3% of games
4.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 48.5% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
15 matches
#1 Singles
23%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
6 matches
#2 Singles
8%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King