← Search

Sarah Snitker

— year-end
54 matches · 44W–10L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Sarah Snitker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
W
2026-03-08 · Canyon Creek/Gooch W3.5S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqueline Carson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Spoons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-01 · Canyon Creek/Gooch W3.5S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqueline Carson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Kelly Britson / Michelle Jones
2026-02-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqueline Carson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-02-22 · Canyon Creek/Gooch W3.5S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqueline Carson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
Corinne Carpenter / Jennifer Evans
2026-02-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenifer Mathews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-02-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with ROSEMARY BATES
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-02-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacqueline Carson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
Josie Huffaker / Laura Walker
2026-02-08 · Canyon Creek/Gooch W3.5S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqueline Carson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-02-07 · Canyon Creek/Gooch W3.5S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqueline Carson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-01-18 · Canyon Creek/Gooch W3.5S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Whitaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-01-16 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chrissy Stansell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Teams40 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
81.8%
36W–8L · 62.5% of games
4.0
80%
4W–1L · 59.4% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 67% of the time
#1 Doubles
67%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
6 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe