← Search

Denise Mincak

Bronxville, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
81 matches · 54W–27L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Denise Mincak to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history81 matches
L
2026-09-09 · TIA NR Schuler 18+ 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cristina Mena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cristina Mena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7
L
2026-06-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cristina Mena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cristina Mena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
Jaclyn Hovde / Kate Scappaticci
2026-05-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cristina Mena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-24 · Maximum Tennis Development Zone · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Meyers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-4
W
2026-02-27 · Maximum Tennis Development Zone · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annmarie Riccio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-01-23 · Maximum Tennis Development Zone · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cristina Mena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-12-10 · #1 Doubles · with Cristina Mena championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-11-14 · Maximum Tennis Development Zone · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cristina Mena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-11-04 · Maximum Tennis Development Zone · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Sullivan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-10 · Maximum Tennis Development Zone · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cristina Mena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 66.2% of games
3.0
75%
33W–11L · 61.8% of games
3.5
38.1%
8W–13L · 45.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
17 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer