← Search

Patricia Meyers

— year-end
288 matches · 151W–137L · seasons 2017–2027

Captains: add Patricia Meyers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history288 matches
W
2026-09-09 · TIA NR Schuler 18+ 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helene Ginsburg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-09 · #2 Doubles · with Stephanie Manheim championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Alexis Capezza championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Helene Ginsburg championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Alexis Capezza championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Randa Sauerborn championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
Rebecca Dickson / Jennifer Shim
2026-07-15 · #1 Doubles · with Alexis Capezza championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-14 · WTC The Hot Shots 55+ 7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Teoh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-13 · #1 Doubles · with Alexis Capezza championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-09 · Southern: TIA 3.5 Sauerborn 18+ 3.5 Day · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helene Ginsburg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori de la Guardia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-6
W
2026-06-25 · Southern: TIA 3.5 Sauerborn 18+ 3.5 Day · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Schuler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
Teams35 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
51.9%
28W–26L · 51.5% of games
3.5
53.4%
102W–89L · 52.2% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 47.9% of games
7.0mixed
57.1%
12W–9L · 53.5% of games
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 57.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
139 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
85 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
40 matches
#1 Singles
7%
19 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams