← Search

Richard DePerrot

— year-end
50 matches · 13W–37L · seasons 2022–2024

Captains: add Richard DePerrot to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
L
2024-08-18 · RCW Zink · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joseph Vera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2024-08-17 · RCW - Match Men (Yeagley) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Kellam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2024-08-10 · RCW Zink · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joseph Vera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-08-06 · RCW - Match Men (Yeagley) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sunil Patel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2024-08-02 · RCW - Match Men (Yeagley) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anthony Battista
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-07-27 · RCW - Match Men (Yeagley) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sunil Patel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2024-07-20 · RCW - Match Men (Yeagley) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sunil Patel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2024-07-19 · Hempfield-Fire Baum (Baumer) · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Larry Tedder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-07-18 · RCW - Match Men (Yeagley) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Troop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2024-07-16 · RCW - Zink · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Gales
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2024-07-16 · Hempfield-Fire Baum (Baumer) · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steve de Perrot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2024-07-13 · RCW - Zink · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jon Bridgeman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
Teams10 teams · 2022–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
14.3%
2W–12L · 34.8% of games
3.5
50%
2W–2L · 44.8% of games
6.0
31.2%
5W–11L · 41.9% of games
8.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 39.2% of games
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 32.4% of games
7.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 28.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal