← Search

Steve de Perrot

Lititz, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
57 matches · 24W–33L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Steve de Perrot to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history57 matches
L
2026-07-18 · RCW - Sumar · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jody Sambrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-03-14 · Hempfield MTC (Evans) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amanda Christman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-02-21 · Hempfield MTC (Evans) · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melissa Landis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-07 · Hempfield MTC (Evans) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debra Leibig mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-01-31 · Hempfield MTC (Evans) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amanda Christman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-01-03 · Hempfield MTC (Evans) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amanda Christman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-15 · RCW Loose Strings (Johnson) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Bosch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2025-11-01 · RCW Loose Strings (Johnson) · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrea Holder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-03 · RCW Loose Strings (Johnson) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Bosch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Jared Sumar championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-21 · RCW - Zink · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Fulmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-07-19 · RCW - Zink · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Harkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 49.2% of games
3.5
38.5%
5W–8L · 41.7% of games
4.5
100%
4W–0L · 66.2% of games
6.0
75%
6W–2L · 59.1% of games
7.0mixed
28%
7W–18L · 42% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
12 matches
#1 Singles
11%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams