← Search

Elizabeth Sellers

Birmingham, AL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
51 matches · 35W–16L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Elizabeth Sellers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history51 matches
W
2026-09-11 · Homewood - White/Allen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-09-04 · Homewood - White/Allen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-24 · Homewood - Lacey · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Bingham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-19 · West Homewood - Hollis/Sellers · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie Hollis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-03 · Homewood - Lacey · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Margaret Lacey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-22 · West Homewood - Hollis/Sellers · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie Hollis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-20 · Homewood - Lacey · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Bingham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-16 · West Homewood - Hollis/Sellers · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Drake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-15 · West Homewood - Hollis/Sellers · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie Hollis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-06-17 · West Homewood - Lacey · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Dunavant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-14 · West Homewood - Chen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Sellers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-10 · West Homewood - Lacey · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Calagaz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
83.3%
20W–4L · 66.9% of games
3.5
53.8%
7W–6L · 53.7% of games
6.5
75%
6W–2L · 58% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
10 matches
#1 Singles
16%
8 matches
#2 Singles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert