← Search

Margaret Lacey

— year-end
82 matches · 62W–20L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Margaret Lacey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history82 matches
W
2026-09-03 · West Homewood - Lacey/Bingham · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Hoke Alexander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-26 · Homewood - Lacey · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lauren Calagaz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-08-17 · Homewood - Lacey · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lauren Calagaz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-03 · Homewood - Lacey · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Sellers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-31 · Homewood - Lacey · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Chadha
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Jana Smith / Anne Miller
2026-07-22 · Homewood - Bingham/Lacey · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Annie Lacey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-11 · BH - Lacey/Bingham · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hayley House
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-10 · West Homewood - Lacey · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hayley House
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0
W
2026-05-27 · West Homewood - Lacey · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karly Trent
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-13 · West Homewood - Lacey · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robin Griffis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-02-16 · West Homewood - Petrella · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-14 · West Homewood - Petrella · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Petrella
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Teams51 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
80.5%
33W–8L · 61.8% of games
4.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 58.1% of games
6.5
50%
5W–5L · 48.3% of games
7.5
82.4%
14W–3L · 57.1% of games
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
27 matches
#2 Singles
12%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
10 matches
#1 Singles
9%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer