← Search

Erika Pracht

North Augusta, SC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
63 matches · 21W–42L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Erika Pracht to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history63 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Newman/Dowdey · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diane Faircloth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-09-01 · Newman/Dowdey · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandra Dowdey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-30 · RVW/Kranenberg · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandra Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-2
L
Jennifer Myers / Beth Shedd
2026-08-25 · Newman/Dowdey · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandra Dowdey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-23 · RVW/Kranenberg · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandra Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-31 · NTC Sprague 6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ashley Pracht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-23 · Newman Sprague · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Denise Vaughn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-20 · NTC Sprague 6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Senn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-06 · NTC Sprague 6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ashley Pracht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-26 · Newman Sprague · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ashley Pracht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-12 · Newman Sprague · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ashley Pracht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-25 · NTC Sprague 6.5 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lindsey Wilkinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
37.8%
17W–28L · 43.9% of games
3.5
20%
1W–4L · 38.5% of games
6.5
23.1%
3W–10L · 39.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
6 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova