← Search

Nora Rader

— year-end
51 matches · 23W–28L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Nora Rader to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history51 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Newman/White · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Leonard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Jennifer Myers / Kimberly Trapp
2026-09-01 · Newman/White · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-31 · CCRC/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cynthia Zgol
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-08-30 · CCRC/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Otis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-2
L
2026-08-25 · Newman/White · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Connie Richards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-30 · Springlakes-Addyman · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Olmstead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-4
L
2026-06-16 · Springlakes-Addyman · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Ellen Earwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-09 · Springlakes-Addyman · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Vickie Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-12 · Springlakes-Addyman · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Vickie Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-30 · CCRC - Esposito · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Leonard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-03-25 · CCRC - Esposito · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Connie Richards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-22 · CCRC - Esposito · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kirstin Shaffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Teams23 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
50%
22W–22L · 50.9% of games
6.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 41.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 47% of the time
#3 Doubles
47%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
9 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer