← Search

Jessica Rawden

Manchester, MO
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
62 matches · 39W–23L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jessica Rawden to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history62 matches
L
2026-04-19 · Hoxsey 3.5W (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kara Sair
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-22 · Hoxsey 3.5W (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Lorence
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-03-15 · Hoxsey 3.5W (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Renee Breer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-2, 0-1
W
2026-02-22 · Hoxsey 3.5W (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Renee Breer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-6
L
2026-02-15 · Hoxsey 3.5W (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-18 · Hoxsey 3.5W (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison Brinker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2024-10-06 · Hoxsey (F) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-09-22 · Hoxsey (F) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-5
W
2024-09-15 · Hoxsey (F) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2024-07-31 · STL/Sandweiss/18&Over8.0MXD · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with McKenzie Rawden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2024-06-24 · STL/Sandweiss/18&Over8.0MXD · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with McKenzie Rawden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
Robert Holthaus / Leonor Maliszewski
2024-06-12 · STL/Sandweiss/18&Over8.0MXD · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with McKenzie Rawden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 79.3% of games
3.0
100%
5W–0L · 64.4% of games
3.5
51.4%
19W–18L · 52.2% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 51.2% of games
8.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 56.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
20 matches
#1 Singles
32%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
8 matches
#2 Singles
11%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer