← Search

Anne Ross

Saint Louis, MO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
187 matches · 112W–75L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Anne Ross to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history187 matches
W
2026-08-16 · Ross · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Lawlor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-09 · Ross · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Lawlor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-07 · Ross · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Rapponotti mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-26 · Ross/Rehnquist (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ellen Mazur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-04-23 · Ross · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ruth Ehresman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-09 · Ross · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Alice Grady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-03-30 · Boyd/Eveker · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Frawley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-23 · Boyd/Eveker · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Frawley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-03-15 · Ross/Rehnquist (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Mounts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-09 · Boyd/Eveker · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Reitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-02-23 · Boyd/Eveker · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michele Christian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
Julie Moore / Morgan Siebenman
2026-02-22 · Ross/Rehnquist (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Mounts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
56.1%
64W–50L · 51.8% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
73.9%
34W–12L · 57.9% of games
7.0mixed
56%
14W–11L · 49.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
104 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
41 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova