← Search

Lauren Hutcheson

— year-end
39 matches · 25W–14L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Lauren Hutcheson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history39 matches
W
2026-08-24 · HCC Yablonski/Lines · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Madison Ellington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-22 · Hermitage Thompson · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tracy Teal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-12 · HCC Yablonski/Lines · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacey Haug
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-08-03 · HCC Yablonski/Lines · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Madison Ellington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-31 · Hermitage Stinson/Orski · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacey Haug
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-29 · HCC Yablonski/Lines · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacey Haug
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-27 · HCC Yablonski/Lines · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meredith Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-28 · Hermitage Lines Lobbers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Abbey Orski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-18 · Hermitage Lines Lobbers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Abbey Orski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-17 · HCC Betz/Teal 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Teal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-09 · HCC Betz/Teal 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirsten Mullaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-04 · Hermitage- Hutcheson/ Thompson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elizabeth Wiertel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Teams43 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 60.6% of games
3.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 35.8% of games
5.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0
100%
6W–0L · 73.5% of games
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 58.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
9 matches
#1 Singles
5%
2 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal