← Search

Elizabeth Wiertel

Henrico, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
60 matches · 36W–24L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Wiertel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
W
2026-09-09 · HCC-WD-Yablonski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Coates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-02 · HCC-WD-Yablonski · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thu-Hang Groome
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-08-23 · Hermitage Thompson · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sidney Mayer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-22 · Hermitage Thompson · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sidney Mayer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-18 · HCC-WD-Yablonski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Madison Ellington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-14 · HCC-WD-Yablonski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacey Haug
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-09 · Hermitage Thompson · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Charlotte Caporale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-29 · HCC-WD-Yablonski · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Dowd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-28 · Hermitage Thompson 7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stuart Thompson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-10 · 8 Hermitage Stinson/Berents · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-15 · Hermitage Thompson 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Gardner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-09 · Hermitage Thompson 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christopher Forstner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
75%
9W–3L · 59% of games
3.5
42.1%
8W–11L · 44.5% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 51.2% of games
7.0
100%
7W–0L · 62% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 49.5% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
14 matches
#1 Singles
7%
4 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova