← Search

Jim Halpin

Naples, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 22W–25L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jim Halpin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history47 matches
L
2026-05-28 · The Quarry / Benner · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wes Dawson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-13 · Riverstone / Stein · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Pittsford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-07 · The Quarry / Benner · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Kirsch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-05-06 · Riverstone / Stein · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andy Colvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-30 · The Quarry / Benner · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gerard Benner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-29 · Riverstone / Stein · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leonard Kichler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
Michael DeVoe / Gary Dellovade
2026-04-28 · The Quarry / Benner · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Pittsford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-22 · Riverstone / Stein · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-04-16 · The Quarry / Benner · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Pittsford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-15 · Riverstone / Stein · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Stein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-01 · Riverstone / Stein · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Pittsford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-04 · Riverstone / Stein · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Pittsford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
57.6%
19W–14L · 50.6% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 32.5% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
11 matches
#1 Singles
6%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams