← Search

Matt Pittsford

— year-end
30 matches · 18W–12L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Matt Pittsford to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history30 matches
W
2026-05-26 · Riverstone / Stein · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Timothy Seivert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-14 · The Quarry / Benner · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wes Dawson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-13 · Riverstone / Stein · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jim Halpin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-29 · Riverstone / Stein · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Stein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-04-28 · The Quarry / Benner · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Halpin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-16 · The Quarry / Benner · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Halpin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-15 · Riverstone / Stein · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-09 · The Quarry / Benner · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gerard Benner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-08 · Riverstone / Stein · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-01 · Riverstone / Stein · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jim Halpin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-26 · The Quarry / Benner · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-25 · Riverstone / Stein · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Timothy Seivert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
70.8%
17W–7L · 52.5% of games
4.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 33.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
8 matches
#2 Singles
13%
4 matches
#1 Singles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova