← Search

Beth Farrell

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 47W–43L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Beth Farrell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
L
2026-08-30 · La.Holderness18C · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Christine Conti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-23 · MLong.18.6.5C-DUR · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa McDermott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
Elizabeth Schacht / Elizabeth Smith
2026-08-16 · La.Holderness18C · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kelly Baltzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-12 · Be.Farrell40C · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lauren Hampton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-09 · La.Holderness18C · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Nichelle Satterfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-2
L
2026-08-02 · La.Holderness18C · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Nichelle Satterfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-01 · Ha.Broglin18T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cristine Allison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-29 · Ca.Zimmerman55M · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bruce Farrell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-16 · Je.Williams40M · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bruce Farrell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · Ha.Broglin18T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cristine Allison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · Ha.Broglin18T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barbra Wait
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-25 · Je.Williams40M · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bruce Farrell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
66.7%
10W–5L · 55% of games
3.0
47.2%
17W–19L · 49.8% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
42.9%
6W–8L · 52.5% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
56.2%
9W–7L · 50.2% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
26 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe