← Search

Vinaya Verghese

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
237 matches · 111W–126L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Vinaya Verghese to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history237 matches
W
N/A
2026-08-09 · ACP.Naramor · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Holly Santago
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-30 · Je.Komes40C6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julie Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · Je.Komes18T3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-06-27 · Je.Komes18T3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenny Komes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · Je.Komes18T3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barbara Wilhelm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Casey Prince / Jennifer Graham
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · with Jamie McCallum championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
Rachel Roberson / Claire Owens
2026-06-12 · #1 Doubles · with Jamie McCallum championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-11 · #3 Doubles · with Barbara Wilhelm championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
Stephanie Vaughn / Martine Maness
2026-06-11 · #3 Doubles · with Corinna Proctor championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-06-06 · Je.Komes18T3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenny Komes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-26 · #3 Doubles · with Barbara Wilhelm championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-23 · Je.Komes18T3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamie McCallum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
61.1%
66W–42L · 55.1% of games
3.5
28.9%
13W–32L · 43.3% of games
5.5
53.3%
8W–7L · 54.8% of games
6.5
34.2%
13W–25L · 42.2% of games
3.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 58.1% of games
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 41.4% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
104 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
73 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
44 matches
#2 Singles
3%
8 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova